Ingrid Wu
American (from China) entrepreneur, co-founder (AAC Technologies Holdings), business executive, billionaire
Source: Wikidata — retrieved 10/11/2026 (wikidata)Dispute
Profile Summary
A net worth stated in this summary may be out of date.
Ingrid Wu is an American entrepreneur from China and business executive who co-founded AAC Technologies Holdings. She has an estimated net worth of ~$1.0B and is listed in the manufacturing industry. Wikidata
Business & SEC Activity
Wu is identified as a co-founder of AAC Technologies Holdings and as a business executive. Wikidata
Philanthropy
Three listed Wu Family Foundation returns—two for tax year 2023 and one for tax year 2015—report combined assets of $519,389 and combined grants paid of $18,000. The Reston, Virginia foundation reported $338,163 in assets and $1,000 in grants in 2023; the Montclair, New Jersey foundation reported $172,562 in assets and $15,000 in grants in 2023; and the Huntsville, Alabama foundation reported $8,664 in assets and $2,000 in grants in 2015. ProPublica 990
Political Activity
FEC records show at least 100 federal contributions; the figures below cover only the 100 most recent contributions on file, sampled from September 6, 2020 through December 6, 2024. Those sampled contributions total $2,240.78: $1,690.78 is classified as Unknown and $550 went to Democratic recipients. The largest listed recipients in the sample were ActBlue ($1,106.50), DNC Services Corp/Democratic National Committee ($500), Biden Fight Fund ($500), WinRed ($84.28), and Harris for President ($50). FEC
These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.
U.S. Presence
Philanthropy
Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.
Political Contributions
These figures cover the 100 most recent of 156 federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.
By Party (in the sample)
Every party in this sample is listed here. The bars are rounded for display; unrounded they total exactly $2,240.78.
Top Recipients (in the sample)
Matched by name only. These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.
Score Breakdown
The giving score is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.
Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).
Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry
How much sourced public record we hold about this person — net worth, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, Wikidata. It measures our coverage, not how open the person is. Each further kind of record scores higher, up to eight. Political donation records matched to a person by name alone are not counted: they may belong to someone else with the same name. From October 7, 2026, our own AI-written summary and the profile photo are not counted either — neither is a public record — so grades that leaned on them moved down that day.
Data: SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata
Formula (v2): Giving score = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Data coverage
Scored on 10/16/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.
All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source. View on Wikidata