← All Profiles
RS

Ronda Stryker

American businesswoman, billionaire heiress

MichiganHealthcare

AIProfile Summary

Ronda Stryker is a U.S. businesswoman and billionaire heiress in Michigan's healthcare sector. She was born in 1954 and has an estimated net worth of ~$1.0 billion. Wikidata

Business & SEC Activity

SEC records identify Ronda E. Stryker as an insider associated with Stryker Corp. and several investment funds. The records show 668 insider filings; recent filings include Form 4 reports, which disclose changes in an insider's company holdings, and a Form 144 notice, which signals a proposed securities sale. SEC EDGAR

Political Activity

Federal Election Commission records show 14 contributions totaling $60,500 from October 19, 2000, through October 14, 2025. Of that amount, $59,900 went to Democratic committees or candidates, including the Democratic National Committee ($40,000) and the Michigan Democratic State Central Committee ($10,000); $600 went to PACs or other recipients. FEC

In the News

News reports dated March 5–6, 2026, say Stryker was appointed to the Western Michigan University board and link her to an incoming Kalamazoo arena. Other coverage has included her among U.S. billionaire women and healthcare billionaires. NewsAPI

AI-generated summary from wikidata, newsapi, fec, sec_edgar, gdelt 8/1/2026 (gpt-5.6-luna). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

otherU.S. economic presence

FECPolitical Contributions

$61KTotal Contributed
14Contributions
2000–2025Date Range

By Party

DEM
$60K
PAC/Other
$600

Top Recipients

DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE$25K
DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE$15K
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITEE$10K
SCHAUER FOR CONGRESS$5K
CYNTHIA WALLACE FOR CONGRESS$3K

Matched by name only. These are the donations the FEC lists under this person’s name — so a different person with the same name can show up here too.

Source: FEC contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 3/10/2026) (fec)

SECSEC Filings

668Total Filings
668Insider Filings
161EDGAR Mentions
0001242914Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

4FORM 4
2/24/2026
4FORM 4
2/18/2026
4FORM 4
2/6/2026
4FORM 4
1/14/2026
4FORM 4
11/7/2025
144xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
11/5/2025
4FORM 4
8/7/2025
4FORM 4
5/12/2025
4FORM 4
5/8/2025
4FORM 4
2/27/2025
Source: SEC EDGAR regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 3/9/2026) (sec_derived)

PBSScore Breakdown

D
26.3
Public Benefit Score

The PBS is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
No data

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

No giving data on file. That is a gap in our sources, not a finding that this person gives nothing — and because the component still counts as zero, it holds this score down. Know of a gift we are missing? Tell us and we will source it.

Transparency35% weight
75%

How much sourced, public accountability data exists — net worth, political contributions, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, and a verified profile. More public disclosure scores higher.

Data: FEC, SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): PBS = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Transparency

Scored on 8/31/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source. View on Wikidata

Ronda Stryker — Public Benefit Score D (26) | Billionaire Army