← All Profiles
HM
Howard Marks
New YorkFinance
C
32.6
PBS
~$2.2B
Profile Summary
Howard Marks is a New York-based finance executive born in 1946, with an estimated net worth of ~$2.2B RTB. SEC records identify him as "Marks Howard Edward" and show 31 filings tied to him, including 30 insider ownership filings SEC EDGAR.
Business & SEC Activity
SEC EDGAR lists 30 recent Form 4 filings for Howard Marks. Form 4 is the SEC filing insiders use to report changes in ownership of company securities, so this pattern indicates repeated insider reporting activity rather than a single one-time filing SEC EDGAR.
Philanthropy
ProPublica 990 data shows three Marks-related foundations with total foundation assets of $17,901,457 and total grants paid of $809,034 ProPublica 990. The largest is the Marks Family Foundation in Bainbridge Island, WA, which reported $17,719,811 in assets and $792,389 in grants paid for tax year 2023 ProPublica 990.
Political Activity
FEC records show 100 contributions totaling $288,075.21 from 2024-09-20 to 2025-12-20 FEC. By party, $96,048 went to Democrats, $25,250.38 to Republicans, and $166,776.83 to recipients marked Unknown FEC.
In the News
Recent coverage focused on Howard Marks' views on private credit and AI. Headlines from CNBC and Benzinga quoted him saying there is no systemic problem with private credit and that private credit standards were too low and could set the scene for a correction NewsAPIGDELT.
U.S. Presence
residenceNew York, New York
Philanthropy
$17.9MFoundation Assets
$809KGrants Paid
3Foundations
Marks FoundationHenrico, VA
Assets: $181KRevenue: $14KGrants: $17KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit ExplorerMarks FoundationWestport, CT
Private grantmaking foundation (IRS NTEE T20Z)
Assets: $493Revenue: $4Grants: $0Tax Year: 2020
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit ExplorerMarks Family FoundationBainbridge Is, WA
Private independent foundation (IRS NTEE T22)
Assets: $17.7MRevenue: $1.7MGrants: $792KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit ExplorerPolitical Contributions
$288KTotal Contributed
100Contributions
2024–2025Date Range
By Party
Top Recipients
FRONTLINE PROTECTION FUND$52K
HMP$50K
JEFFRIES VICTORY FUND$25K
HOGAN VICTORY FUND$25K
NRSC$25K
SEC Filings
31Total Filings
30Insider Filings
1,743EDGAR Mentions
0001934257Personal CIK
Associated Companies
Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.
Recent Insider Filings
4OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
4/29/20264OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
3/16/20264OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
3/3/20264OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
1/5/20264OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
11/12/20254OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
7/30/20254OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
7/2/20254OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
6/17/20254OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
5/29/20254OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
4/1/2025Recent News
80Total Articles
Seeking AlphaTop Source
NeutralAvg. Sentiment
Score Breakdown
C
32.6
Public Benefit Score
The PBS is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.
Philanthropy65% weight
Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).
Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry
Transparency35% weight
How much sourced, public accountability data exists — net worth, political contributions, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, and a verified profile. More public disclosure scores higher.
Data: FEC, SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata
Formula (v2): PBS = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Transparency
Scored on 6/23/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.
All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.