← All Profiles
WW

Walter Wang

CaliforniaManufacturing
Compare Walter Wang with another billionaire →

AIProfile Summary

Walter Wang is a California-based manufacturing billionaire, born in 1965, with an estimated net worth of ~$2.1B RTB. SEC records identify a filing entity as Wang Walter Lin and show beneficial-ownership filings connected to ATA Inc. SEC EDGAR.

Business & SEC Activity

SEC EDGAR lists five filings by Wang Walter Lin associated with ATA Inc. (ticker: AACG), including a Schedule 13G filed in 2009 and four amendments through 2014 SEC EDGAR. A Schedule 13G reports beneficial ownership of a public company’s shares; an amendment updates an earlier ownership report.

Philanthropy

ProPublica records list three organizations named Wang Foundation, in New York, Berkeley, and Pebble Beach ProPublica 990. The two California foundations with reported financial data held combined assets of $487,412 and paid $2,161 in grants across their listed tax years; the Berkeley foundation reported $480,172 in assets and $1,626 in grants paid for 2023 ProPublica 990.

Political Activity

FEC data shows at least 100 federal contributions in the most recent sampled records, totaling $1,352,240; these figures cover only the 100 most recent contributions on file, not the full history FEC. Of that sampled total, $704,880 was categorized as Unknown, $631,060 as Republican, and $16,300 as Democratic FEC. The largest listed recipients in the sample were NRCC ($442,180), Protect the House 2024 ($338,500), Issa Victory Fund ($325,000), Invest in a Strong and Secure America ($15,000), and Majority PAC ($15,000) FEC.

These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

AI-generated summary from fec, rtb, propublica_990, sec_edgar — 9/13/2026 (gpt-5.6-terra). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

residenceLos Angeles, California

990Philanthropy

Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.

$487KFoundation Assets
$2KGrants Paid
3Foundations
Wang FoundationNew York, NY
Arts, culture & humanities (IRS NTEE A20)
Assets: $0Revenue: $0Grants: $0
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Wang FoundationBerkeley, CA
Assets: $480KRevenue: $22KGrants: $2KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Wang FoundationPebble Beach, CA
Private grantmaking foundation (IRS NTEE T20)
Assets: $7KRevenue: $1Grants: $535Tax Year: 2015
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Source: ProPublica (990) — annual filing · latest on record (retrieved 8/1/2026) (proPublica_990)Dispute

FECPolitical Contributions

$1.4M+In Records We Hold
455Contributions On File
2022–2026Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent of 455 federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

Unknown
$705K
Republican
$631K
Democratic
$16K

Every party in this sample is listed here. The bars are rounded for display; unrounded they total exactly $1,352,240.

Top Recipients (in the sample)

NRCC$442K
PROTECT THE HOUSE 2024$339K
ISSA VICTORY FUND$325K
INVEST IN A STRONG AND SECURE AMERICA$15K
MAJORITY PAC$15K

Matched by name only. These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

Source: FEC — contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 9/12/2026) (fec)Dispute

SECSEC Filings

5Total Filings
5Insider Filings
323EDGAR Mentions
0001456100Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

SC 13G/ASC 13G/A
1/21/2014
SC 13G/ASC 13G/A
1/22/2013
SC 13G/ASCHEDULE 13G AMENDMENT NO. 2
2/10/2012
SC 13G/ASC 13G/A
2/12/2010
SC 13GSCHEDULE 13G
2/17/2009
Source: SEC EDGAR — regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 6/27/2026) (sec_derived)Dispute

SCOREScore Breakdown

F
13
Giving score

The giving score is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
0%

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

Data coverage35% weight
38%

How much sourced public record we hold about this person — net worth, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, Wikidata. It measures our coverage, not how open the person is. Each further kind of record scores higher, up to eight. Political donation records matched to a person by name alone are not counted: they may belong to someone else with the same name. From October 7, 2026, our own AI-written summary and the profile photo are not counted either — neither is a public record — so grades that leaned on them moved down that day.

Data: SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): Giving score = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Data coverage

Scored on 10/16/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.