
Reed Hastings
American entrepreneur and education philanthropist
Source: Wikidata — retrieved 8/30/2026 (wikidata)
Profile Summary
Reed Hastings is an American technology entrepreneur and education philanthropist from California, born in 1960. He is identified as a Netflix co-founder, and his estimated net worth is ~$6.3 billion Wikidata NewsAPI.
Business & SEC Activity
Hastings built his wealth through Netflix, a prepackaged-software and technology company listed in SEC records as Netflix Inc. SEC EDGAR. SEC records also associate him with Facebook Inc. and show 858 filings, including 856 insider filings. Form 4 filings generally report transactions by company insiders, while Form 144 filings notify regulators of proposed sales of restricted or control securities SEC EDGAR.
Philanthropy
Three Hastings foundations reported $41.4 million in combined assets and $3.84 million in grants paid for tax year 2023 ProPublica 990. The Hastings Foundation in California reported $2.01 million in grants, the Pennsylvania Hastings Foundation Tr reported $1.53 million, and Hastings Foundation Inc. in Connecticut reported $298,458 ProPublica 990. Hastings is also listed as a Giving Pledge signatory Giving Pledge.
Political Activity
Hastings has at least 100 federal contributions; the figures below cover only the most recent 100 records sampled, not his full contribution history FEC. Those sampled records totaled $18.91 million, including $698,500 categorized as Democratic and $18.22 million categorized as PAC/Other; the sample's largest listed recipients were Republican Accountability PAC at $6.91 million and SMP at $5.99 million FEC.
In the News
A Fortune article dated August 18, 2026, reported that Hastings said companies are not families and connected that view to Netflix's 2001 layoffs, when roughly one-third of its workforce was cut NewsAPI. A Forbes article dated August 3, 2026, described Hastings discussing emotional skills and an EQ exercise for teams, while a June 24, 2026, Yahoo Finance headline discussed Netflix's decline since he said he was leaving GDELT.
U.S. Presence
Philanthropy
Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.
Political Contributions
These figures cover the 100 most recent federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.
By Party (in the sample)
Top Recipients (in the sample)
Matched by name only. These are the donations the FEC lists under this person’s name — so a different person with the same name can show up here too.
SEC Filings
Associated Companies
Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.
Recent Insider Filings
News Coverage
Coverage window: 2026-08-18 to 2026-08-18 · retrieved 8/22/2026

Score Breakdown
The PBS is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.
Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).
Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry
How much sourced, public accountability data exists — net worth, political contributions, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, and a verified profile. More public disclosure scores higher.
Data: FEC, SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata
Formula (v2): PBS = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Transparency
Scored on 8/31/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.
All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source. View on Wikidata