← All Profiles
Gail Miller

Gail Miller

American businesswoman

UtahTechnology
D
27
Giving Score
uses a net worth as of 2025
Compare Gail Miller with another billionaire →

AIProfile Summary

A net worth stated in this summary may be out of date.

Gail Miller is an American businesswoman, born in 1943, associated with Utah and the technology industry. She has an estimated net worth of ~$4.8B. Wikidata

Business & SEC Activity

SEC EDGAR identifies filings for “Miller Gail A,” including 10 insider filings from June 2023 through March 2025. These include Form 3 filings, which report an insider’s initial ownership, and Form 4 filings, which report changes in an insider’s ownership or transactions; companies listed in the SEC search results include Remitly Global, Toast, Asbury Automotive Group, Diffusion Pharmaceuticals, and Dominion Resources. SEC EDGAR

Philanthropy

Three Miller Foundation filings for tax year 2023 reported combined grants paid of $1,222,156 and combined assets of $2,622,649. The California-based Miller Foundation reported $1,098,906 in grants paid, while foundations in New York and Ohio reported $93,500 and $29,750, respectively. ProPublica 990

Political Activity

The FEC reports at least 8,698 federal contributions; the available figures cover only the 100 most recent records on file, dated May 20 through July 31, 2026. Those sampled records total $3,893.50: $2,437.50 to Democratic recipients and $1,456 to recipients with an unknown party designation. The largest listed recipients in the sample were the North Carolina Democratic Party - Federal ($1,000), ActBlue ($975), Maggie for Congress ($500), DSCC ($250), and Bob Brooks for Congress ($250). FEC

These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

AI-generated summary from propublica_990, fec, gdelt, sec_edgar, wikidata — 9/13/2026 (gpt-5.6-terra). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

otherU.S. economic presence

990Philanthropy

Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.

$2.6MFoundation Assets
$1.2MGrants Paid
3Foundations
Miller FoundationOrange, CA
Human services (IRS NTEE P20)
Assets: $966KRevenue: $1.2MGrants: $1.1MTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Miller FoundationWhite Plains, NY
Assets: $1.1MRevenue: $221KGrants: $94KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Miller FoundationToledo, OH
Assets: $535KRevenue: $56KGrants: $30KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Source: ProPublica (990) — annual filing · latest on record (retrieved 8/1/2026) (proPublica_990)Dispute

FECPolitical Contributions

$4K+In Records We Hold
8698Contributions On File
2026–2026Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent of 8,698 federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

Democratic
$2K
Unknown
$1K

Every party in this sample is listed here. The bars are rounded for display; unrounded they total exactly $3,893.50.

Top Recipients (in the sample)

NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY - FEDERAL$1K
ACTBLUE$975
MAGGIE FOR CONGRESS$500
DSCC$250
BOB BROOKS FOR CONGRESS$250

Matched by name only. These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

Source: FEC — contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 9/13/2026) (fec)Dispute

SECSEC Filings

10Total Filings
10Insider Filings
37EDGAR Mentions
0001979087Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

4FORM 4
3/11/2025
3FORM 3
3/4/2025
4FORM 4
2/27/2025
4FORM 4
11/27/2024
4FORM 4
8/27/2024
4FORM 4
8/21/2024
4FORM 4
5/29/2024
4FORM 4
4/18/2024
4FORM 4
6/15/2023
3FORM 3
6/1/2023
Source: SEC EDGAR — regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 3/9/2026) (sec_derived)Dispute

SCOREScore Breakdown

D
27
Giving score
uses a net worth as of 2025

The giving score is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
8%

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

Data coverage35% weight
63%

How much sourced public record we hold about this person — net worth, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, Wikidata. It measures our coverage, not how open the person is. Each further kind of record scores higher, up to eight. Political donation records matched to a person by name alone are not counted: they may belong to someone else with the same name. From October 7, 2026, our own AI-written summary and the profile photo are not counted either — neither is a public record — so grades that leaned on them moved down that day.

Data: SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): Giving score = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Data coverage

Scored on 10/16/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source. View on Wikidata