← All Profiles
JT

James Tisch

New YorkDiversified
Compare James Tisch with another billionaire →

AIProfile Summary

James Tisch is a New York-based U.S. billionaire in the diversified industry, born in 1953. He has an estimated net worth of ~$1.9B RTB.

Business & SEC Activity

SEC EDGAR lists 279 insider filings for James S. Tisch, with filings associated with General Electric, SkyPostal Networks, and LBI Investments SEC EDGAR. Recent filings include nine Form 4 reports—forms used by corporate insiders to report changes in their holdings—and one Form 144 notice, which signals a proposed sale of restricted or control securities SEC EDGAR.

Philanthropy

Three Tisch-related foundations reported combined 2023 grant payments of $18,206,420 and combined assets of $807,269 ProPublica 990. The James and Merryl Tisch Foundation reported $18,075,166 in grants paid, while the Tisch Foundation reported $131,254 ProPublica 990. The James S. Tisch Family Foundation reported $8 in assets and $0 in grants paid in 2023 ProPublica 990.

Political Activity

The FEC sample shows at least 100 federal contributions totaling $148,842 in the most recent 100 records on file, covering 2024-09-19 to 2026-07-18 FEC. Of that sampled total, $117,167 was classified as Unknown, $24,300 as Republican, and $7,375 as Democratic FEC. The largest listed recipient was The Sentinel Action Fund, which received $100,000; Lawler Victory Fund, Lawler for Congress, Rogers for Senate, and Team Rogers each received $7,000 FEC.

These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

AI-generated summary from gdelt, rtb, fec, propublica_990, sec_edgar — 9/13/2026 (gpt-5.6-terra). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

residenceNew York, New York

990Philanthropy

Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.

$807KFoundation Assets
$18.2MGrants Paid
3Foundations
Tisch Foundation IncNew York, NY
Assets: $300KRevenue: $52KGrants: $131KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
James S Tisch Family FoundationNew York, NY
Corporate foundation (IRS NTEE T21)
Assets: $8Revenue: $1Grants: $0Tax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
James And Merryl Tisch Foundation IncNew York, NY
Assets: $507KRevenue: $20.5MGrants: $18.1MTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Source: ProPublica (990) — annual filing · latest on record (retrieved 8/1/2026) (proPublica_990)Dispute

FECPolitical Contributions

$149K+In Records We Hold
719Contributions On File
2024–2026Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent of 719 federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

Unknown
$117K
Republican
$24K
Democratic
$7K

Every party in this sample is listed here. The bars are rounded for display; unrounded they total exactly $148,842.

Top Recipients (in the sample)

THE SENTINEL ACTION FUND$100K
LAWLER VICTORY FUND$7K
LAWLER FOR CONGRESS, INC.$7K
ROGERS FOR SENATE$7K
TEAM ROGERS$7K

Matched by name only. These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

Source: FEC — contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 9/12/2026) (fec)Dispute

SECSEC Filings

279Total Filings
279Insider Filings
1,108EDGAR Mentions
0001010178Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

4FORM 4
5/11/2026
4FORM 4
3/31/2026
4FORM 4
1/5/2026
4FORM 4
9/30/2025
4FORM 4
7/1/2025
4FORM 4
5/30/2025
4FORM 4
5/14/2025
4FORM 4
5/8/2025
144xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
3/14/2025
4FORM 4
2/10/2025
Source: SEC EDGAR — regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 6/27/2026) (sec_derived)Dispute

SCOREScore Breakdown

B
45
Giving score

The giving score is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
43%

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

Data coverage35% weight
50%

How much sourced public record we hold about this person — net worth, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, Wikidata. It measures our coverage, not how open the person is. Each further kind of record scores higher, up to eight. Political donation records matched to a person by name alone are not counted: they may belong to someone else with the same name. From October 7, 2026, our own AI-written summary and the profile photo are not counted either — neither is a public record — so grades that leaned on them moved down that day.

Data: SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): Giving score = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Data coverage

Scored on 10/16/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.