← All Profiles
HR
Hartley Rogers
New YorkFinance
B
50.8
PBS
~$1.2B
Profile Summary
Hartley Rogers is a New York-based finance executive born in 1959, with an estimated net worth of ~$1.2B RTB. He is associated with Hamilton Lane Inc., an investment advice firm, and the SEC data shows extensive filing activity tied to the company and related entities SEC EDGAR.
Business & SEC Activity
SEC records identify Hamilton Lane Inc. as an operating company in the investment advice business, with related entities HLA Investments LLC and HRHLA, LLC also listed SEC EDGAR. The dataset shows 643 total SEC filings and 418 insider filings, including multiple Form 4 reports in June 2026; Form 4 is the SEC filing insiders use to report changes in their ownership of company securities SEC EDGAR.
Philanthropy
Rogers is linked to three foundations that reported a combined $8,028,358 in grants paid and $37,858,685 in total assets ProPublica 990. The largest was The Rogers Foundation, which reported $7,407,740 in grants paid and $32,213,736 in assets for tax year 2023 ProPublica 990.
Political Activity
From 2009 to 2025, Rogers made 100 federal contributions totaling $440,115.45 FEC. The largest recipient was DNC Services Corp / Democratic National Committee at $75,600, and the party breakdown shows $186,558.45 to Democrats, $83,400 to Republicans, and $170,157 listed as unknown FEC.
In the News
A February 12, 2026 article in The Jerusalem Post mentioned Hartley Rogers in a business and banking context NewsAPI. No other validated news articles were returned in the dataset GDELT.
U.S. Presence
residenceNew York, New York
Philanthropy
$37.9MFoundation Assets
$8.0MGrants Paid
3Foundations
Rogers FoundationLincoln, NE
Assets: $5.6MRevenue: $599KGrants: $597KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit ExplorerNancy Rogers FoundationQueen Creek, AZ
Private operating foundation (IRS NTEE T23)
Assets: $49KRevenue: $23KGrants: $24KTax Year: 2022
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit ExplorerThe Rogers FoundationTyler, TX
Assets: $32.2MRevenue: $2.1MGrants: $7.4MTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit ExplorerPolitical Contributions
$440KTotal Contributed
100Contributions
2009–2025Date Range
By Party
Top Recipients
DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE$76K
BIDEN ACTION FUND$50K
HARRIS ACTION FUND$25K
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE$20K
TOM SUOZZI VICTORY FUND$20K
SEC Filings
643Total Filings
418Insider Filings
74EDGAR Mentions
Associated Companies
Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.
Recent Insider Filings
4FORM 4
6/15/20264FORM 4
6/15/20264FORM 4
6/15/20264FORM 4
6/2/20264FORM 4
6/2/20264FORM 4
6/2/20264FORM 4
6/2/20264FORM 4
6/2/20264FORM 4
6/2/20264FORM 4
5/28/2026Recent News
1Total Articles
The Jerusalem PostTop Source
NeutralAvg. Sentiment
Score Breakdown
B
50.8
Public Benefit Score
The PBS is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.
Philanthropy65% weight
Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).
Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry
Transparency35% weight
How much sourced, public accountability data exists — net worth, political contributions, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, and a verified profile. More public disclosure scores higher.
Data: FEC, SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata
Formula (v2): PBS = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Transparency
Scored on 6/23/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.
All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.