← All Profiles
BK

Bruce Karsh

CaliforniaFinance
Compare Bruce Karsh with another billionaire →

AIProfile Summary

Bruce Karsh is a U.S. finance figure, born in 1955 and listed in California, with an estimated net worth of ~$2.6 billion RTB. SEC records identify him as a reporting person associated with Oaktree-related entities, Charter Communications, and Inseego SEC EDGAR.

Business & SEC Activity

SEC EDGAR lists 75 insider filings for Karsh, including filings connected to Charter Communications, Inseego, Oaktree Capital Group, Oaktree Capital Management, and Oaktree Holdings SEC EDGAR. His recent filings include Form 3 ownership documents, which disclose an insider's initial holdings; Form 4 submissions, which report changes in insider ownership; Form 5 submissions, which report certain annual ownership changes; and Schedule 13G filings, which disclose beneficial ownership stakes SEC EDGAR.

Philanthropy

The Karsh Family Foundation, based in Beverly Hills, California, reported $336.1 million in assets, $42.3 million in revenue, and $30.4 million in expenses for tax year 2023 ProPublica 990. It reported $28.9 million in grants paid that year ProPublica 990.

Political Activity

FEC records show at least 100 federal contributions in the most recent 100-record sample, covering 2024-05-24 through 2026-07-14, totaling $1,399,650 FEC. The sample's party breakdown was $782,750 to Democratic recipients, $567,000 to recipients with an unknown party designation, $46,600 to Republican recipients, and $3,300 to Independent recipients FEC. The largest recipients in the sample were Harris Action Fund ($419,000), DNC Services Corp / Democratic National Committee ($292,900), DCCC ($155,050), NC Cooper Senate Victory ($51,400), and Collins Victory Committee ($50,000) FEC.

These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

AI-generated summary from gdelt, fec, rtb, propublica_990, sec_edgar — 9/13/2026 (gpt-5.6-terra). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

residenceLos Angeles, California

990Philanthropy

Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.

$336.1MFoundation Assets
$28.9MGrants Paid
1Foundation
Karsh Family FoundationBeverly Hills, CA
Private grantmaking foundation (IRS NTEE T20)
Assets: $336.1MRevenue: $42.3MGrants: $28.9MTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Source: ProPublica (990) — annual filing · latest on record (retrieved 8/1/2026) (proPublica_990)Dispute

FECPolitical Contributions

$1.4M+In Records We Hold
450Contributions On File
2024–2026Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent of 450 federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

Democratic
$783K
Unknown
$567K
Republican
$47K
Independent
$3K

Every party in this sample is listed here. The bars are rounded for display; unrounded they total exactly $1,399,650.

Top Recipients (in the sample)

HARRIS ACTION FUND$419K
DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE$293K
DCCC$155K
NC COOPER SENATE VICTORY$51K
COLLINS VICTORY COMMITTEE$50K

Matched by name only. These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

Source: FEC — contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 9/12/2026) (fec)Dispute

SECSEC Filings

75Total Filings
75Insider Filings
1,113EDGAR Mentions
0001187256Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

3OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
11/8/2021
3OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
11/8/2021
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
10/2/2019
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
7/31/2019
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
5/17/2019
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
2/14/2018
5FORM 5 SUBMISSION
2/13/2018
SC 13G/ASC 13G/A
2/13/2018
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
11/9/2017
SC 13GSC 13G
5/31/2017
Source: SEC EDGAR — regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 6/27/2026) (sec_derived)Dispute

SCOREScore Breakdown

B
46
Giving score

The giving score is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
45%

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

Data coverage35% weight
50%

How much sourced public record we hold about this person — net worth, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, Wikidata. It measures our coverage, not how open the person is. Each further kind of record scores higher, up to eight. Political donation records matched to a person by name alone are not counted: they may belong to someone else with the same name. From October 7, 2026, our own AI-written summary and the profile photo are not counted either — neither is a public record — so grades that leaned on them moved down that day.

Data: SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): Giving score = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Data coverage

Scored on 10/16/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.