← All Profiles
Henry Kravis

Henry Kravis

American businessman

New YorkFinance

AIProfile Summary

Henry Kravis is an American businessman in the finance industry, born in 1944 and based in New York. He has an estimated net worth of ~$15.4 billion. SEC records identify him as an insider associated with KKR & Co. and other KKR-related entities. Wikidata SEC EDGAR

Business & SEC Activity

SEC EDGAR lists 443 insider filings for Henry Kravis and 388 related search hits. The recent filings include Forms 3 and 4: Form 3 reports an insider's initial ownership, while Form 4 reports subsequent changes in ownership. The records include filings connected to KKR & Co. and KKR-related entities. SEC EDGAR

Political Activity

The FEC data shows at least 100 federal contributions; the available figures cover only the most recent 100 records, not his full contribution history. Those sampled records total $2,228,900, including $706,400 coded as Republican, $46,800 as Democratic, $6,600 as independent, $5,800 as non-party-identified, and $1,463,300 as PAC/Other. The largest sampled recipients were SFA Fund, Inc. and Senate Leadership Fund at $500,000 each, followed by Unite America Reform Fund and Keystone Renewal PAC at $250,000 each. FEC

AI-generated summary from wikidata, fec, gdelt, sec_edgar 8/29/2026 (gpt-5.6-luna). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

otherU.S. economic presence

FECPolitical Contributions

$2.2M+In Records We Hold
100+Contributions
2019–2025Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

PAC/Other
$1.5M
REP
$706K
DEM
$47K
IND
$7K
NNE
$6K

Top Recipients (in the sample)

SFA FUND, INC$500K
SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND$500K
UNITE AMERICA REFORM FUND$250K
KEYSTONE RENEWAL PAC$250K
HONOR PENNSYLVANIA, INC.$200K

Matched by name only. These are the donations the FEC lists under this person’s name — so a different person with the same name can show up here too.

Source: FEC contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 3/10/2026) (fec)

SECSEC Filings

443Total Filings
443Insider Filings
388EDGAR Mentions
0001081714Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

4FORM 4
6/5/2026
4FORM 4
6/2/2026
3FORM 3
5/13/2026
4FORM 4
5/4/2026
4FORM 4
4/7/2026
4FORM 4
4/2/2026
4FORM 4
3/10/2026
4FORM 4
3/4/2026
4FORM 4
3/3/2026
4FORM 4
2/3/2026
Source: SEC EDGAR regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 6/27/2026) (sec_derived)

PBSScore Breakdown

C
30.6
Public Benefit Score

The PBS is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
No data

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

No giving data on file. That is a gap in our sources, not a finding that this person gives nothing — and because the component still counts as zero, it holds this score down. Know of a gift we are missing? Tell us and we will source it.

Transparency35% weight
88%

How much sourced, public accountability data exists — net worth, political contributions, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, and a verified profile. More public disclosure scores higher.

Data: FEC, SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): PBS = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Transparency

Scored on 8/31/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source. View on Wikidata

Henry Kravis — Public Benefit Score C (31) | Billionaire Army