← All Profiles
AN

Adam Norwitt

ConnecticutManufacturing
Compare Adam Norwitt with another billionaire →

USU.S. Presence

residenceRidgefield, Connecticut

990Philanthropy

Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.

$7.3MFoundation Assets
$253KGrants Paid
1Foundation
Norwitt Family Charitable FoundationWest Hartford, CT
Private grantmaking foundation (IRS NTEE T20)
Assets: $7.3MRevenue: $9.1MGrants: $253KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Source: ProPublica (990) — annual filing · latest on record (retrieved 8/1/2026) (proPublica_990)Dispute

FECPolitical Contributions

$746K+In Records We Hold
377Contributions On File
2024–2026Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent of 377 federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

Unknown
$457K
Democratic
$290K

Every party in this sample is listed here. The bars are rounded for display; unrounded they total exactly $746,431.37.

Top Recipients (in the sample)

HARRIS VICTORY FUND$325K
OSSOFF VICTORY FUND$41K
COOPER VICTORY FUND$27K
GEORGIA FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMITTEE$26K
TIME TO LEAD PAC$25K

Matched by name only. These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

Source: FEC — contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 9/13/2026) (fec)Dispute

SECSEC Filings

73Total Filings
73Insider Filings
4,871EDGAR Mentions
0001276461Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

4OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
5/27/2026
4OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
5/5/2026
144xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
5/5/2026
144xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
5/4/2026
144xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
5/1/2026
4OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
2/13/2026
144xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
2/12/2026
144xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml
2/12/2026
4OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
12/10/2025
4OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
10/30/2025
Source: SEC EDGAR — regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 6/27/2026) (sec_derived)Dispute

SCOREScore Breakdown

D
21
Giving score

The giving score is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
6%

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

Data coverage35% weight
50%

How much sourced public record we hold about this person — net worth, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, Wikidata. It measures our coverage, not how open the person is. Each further kind of record scores higher, up to eight. Political donation records matched to a person by name alone are not counted: they may belong to someone else with the same name. From October 7, 2026, our own AI-written summary and the profile photo are not counted either — neither is a public record — so grades that leaned on them moved down that day.

Data: SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): Giving score = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Data coverage

Scored on 10/16/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.