Raj Sardana
Profile Summary
Raj Sardana is a U.S.-based technology billionaire in Georgia, born in 1960, with an estimated net worth of ~$2.0B RTB.
Political Activity
From 2009-12-15 to 2025-08-01, Sardana made 8 federal campaign contributions totaling $6,911.41 FEC. His giving went mostly to Democratic recipients, with $4,400 to DEM committees, $250 to REP committees, and $2,261.41 to committees with no party classification FEC. The largest listed recipients were the Committee to Re-Elect Henry Hank Johnson ($2,400), Hindus of Georgia PAC ($2,000), and Raja for Illinois ($1,500) FEC.
U.S. Presence
Political Contributions
By Party
Top Recipients
Matched by name only. These are the donations the FEC lists under this person’s name — so a different person with the same name can show up here too.
Score Breakdown
The PBS is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.
Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).
Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry
No giving data on file. That is a gap in our sources, not a finding that this person gives nothing — and because the component still counts as zero, it holds this score down. Know of a gift we are missing? Tell us and we will source it.
How much sourced, public accountability data exists — net worth, political contributions, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, and a verified profile. More public disclosure scores higher.
Data: FEC, SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata
Formula (v2): PBS = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Transparency
Scored on 8/31/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.
All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.