← All Profiles
CM

Craig McCaw

WashingtonTechnologyGiving Pledge
Compare Craig McCaw with another billionaire →

AIProfile Summary

Craig McCaw is a Washington-based technology billionaire, born in 1949, with an estimated net worth of ~$2.9 billion. RTB

Business & SEC Activity

SEC EDGAR lists McCaw under radiotelephone communications and identifies filings connected to Holicity Inc., Colicity Inc., X-icity Holdings Corp., and Pendrell Corp. SEC EDGAR He has 134 reported insider filings, including Forms 3 and 4. SEC EDGAR Form 3 is an initial report of insider ownership, while Form 4 reports subsequent changes in an insider’s holdings or transactions. SEC EDGAR

Philanthropy

Two foundations associated with McCaw reported combined assets of $10,842,694 and grants paid of $805,576 in tax year 2023. ProPublica 990 The Craig and Susan McCaw Foundation reported $9,025,030 in assets and $728,341 in grants paid, while the McCaw Family Foundation Inc. reported $1,817,664 in assets and $77,235 in grants paid. ProPublica 990

Political Activity

FEC records show at least 100 federal contributions; the figures below cover only the 100 most recent sampled records, dated March 20, 2015, through September 19, 2024. FEC Those sampled contributions total $1,103,913.64: $596,450 to recipients with an unknown party designation, $487,963.64 to Republicans, and $19,500 to Democrats. FEC The largest recipients in the sample were NRSC Targeted State Victory ($220,000), Congressional Leadership Fund ($142,400), NRCC ($95,750), Team Ryan ($85,750), and NRSC ($68,900). FEC

These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

AI-generated summary from gdelt, fec, rtb, propublica_990, giving_pledge, sec_edgar — 9/13/2026 (gpt-5.6-terra). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

residenceHunts Point, Washington

990Philanthropy

Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.

$10.8MFoundation Assets
$806KGrants Paid
2Foundations
Mccaw Family Foundation IncIndianapolis, IN
Philanthropy, voluntarism & grantmaking (IRS NTEE T112)
Assets: $1.8MRevenue: $268KGrants: $77KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Craig And Susan Mccaw FoundationKirkland, WA
Corporate foundation (IRS NTEE T21)
Assets: $9.0MRevenue: $470KGrants: $728KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Source: ProPublica (990) — annual filing · latest on record (retrieved 8/1/2026) (proPublica_990)Dispute

FECPolitical Contributions

$1.1M+In Records We Hold
345Contributions On File
2015–2024Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent of 345 federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

Unknown
$596K
Republican
$488K
Democratic
$20K

Every party in this sample is listed here. The bars are rounded for display; unrounded they total exactly $1,103,913.64.

Top Recipients (in the sample)

NRSC TARGETED STATE VICTORY$220K
CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND$142K
NRCC$96K
TEAM RYAN$86K
NRSC$69K

Matched by name only. These donations are matched to this person by name only, so some may belong to a different person with the same name: FEC filings can include a donor's employer and city, but our matching does not check them against what we know about this person.

Source: FEC — contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 9/13/2026) (fec)Dispute

SECSEC Filings

134Total Filings
134Insider Filings
356EDGAR Mentions
0001014805Personal CIK

Associated Companies

Entities appearing alongside this person in SEC full-text search — an association, not necessarily ownership or control. Follow each link to the primary SEC record to judge for yourself.

Recent Insider Filings

4xslF345X03/ownership.xml
12/29/2021
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
11/12/2021
4xslF345X03/ownership.xml
7/2/2021
3xslF345X02/ownership.xml
2/23/2021
4OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT
9/22/2020
3xslF345X02/ownership.xml
8/6/2020
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
1/3/2018
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
10/3/2017
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
7/5/2017
4FORM 4 SUBMISSION
4/4/2017
Source: SEC EDGAR — regulatory filings · latest on record (retrieved 6/27/2026) (sec_derived)Dispute

SCOREScore Breakdown

C
32
Giving score

The giving score is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
23%

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

Data coverage35% weight
50%

How much sourced public record we hold about this person — net worth, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, Wikidata. It measures our coverage, not how open the person is. Each further kind of record scores higher, up to eight. Political donation records matched to a person by name alone are not counted: they may belong to someone else with the same name. From October 7, 2026, our own AI-written summary and the profile photo are not counted either — neither is a public record — so grades that leaned on them moved down that day.

Data: SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): Giving score = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Data coverage

Scored on 10/16/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.