← All Profiles
JG

Jane Goldman

New YorkReal Estate

AIProfile Summary

Jane Goldman is a U.S. real-estate billionaire based in New York, born in 1955. Her estimated net worth is ~$1.1 billion. RTB

Business & SEC Activity

Goldman is identified as being in the real-estate industry. RTB

Philanthropy

Three Goldman Family Foundation records report combined assets of $8,466,974 and $804,389 in grants paid. Two foundations filed for tax year 2023 and reported $739,000 and $65,389 in grants paid, respectively; a third record reported $0 in assets and grants. ProPublica 990

Political Activity

The available data includes at least 100 federal contributions, with figures covering only the most recent 100 contributions on file; the true total is higher and unknown. In this sample, contributions totaled $17,120.57, including $4,700 identified as Democratic and $12,420.57 categorized as unknown; the largest listed recipients were Equality PAC and Torres Victory Fund at $5,000 each. FEC

In the News

The provided news data contains no validated articles for inclusion. NewsAPI

AI-generated summary from fec, rtb, gdelt, propublica_990 8/29/2026 (gpt-5.6-luna). All claims are derived from the source data shown below.

USU.S. Presence

residenceNew York, New York

990Philanthropy

Foundations are matched to a person by name, not by trustee records — so a same-surname family foundation can land here in error. Every entity below links to its full IRS filing; if one doesn’t belong, tell us at hello@skylarkcreations.com and we’ll pull it.

$8.5MFoundation Assets
$804KGrants Paid
3Foundations
Goldman Family FoundationNewtown, PA
Private grantmaking foundation (IRS NTEE T20)
Assets: $7.4MRevenue: $886KGrants: $739KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Goldman Family FoundationAllentown, PA
Private grantmaking foundation (IRS NTEE T20)
Assets: $1.1MRevenue: $24KGrants: $65KTax Year: 2023
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Goldman Family FoundationRaleigh, NC
Education (IRS NTEE B80)
Assets: $0Revenue: $0Grants: $0
Mission, purpose & full 990 filings → ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Source: ProPublica (990) annual filing · latest on record (retrieved 8/1/2026) (proPublica_990)

FECPolitical Contributions

$17K+In Records We Hold
100+Contributions
2024–2025Range Shown

These figures cover the 100 most recent federal contributions on file, not the full record. The total, party split, top recipients and dates below are all computed over that sample, so each is a floor rather than a complete figure.

By Party (in the sample)

Unknown
$12K
DEM
$5K

Top Recipients (in the sample)

EQUALITY PAC$5K
TORRES VICTORY FUND$5K
FRIENDS OF MARK WARNER$2K
ACTBLUE$2K
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA$1K

Matched by name only. These are the donations the FEC lists under this person’s name — so a different person with the same name can show up here too.

Source: FEC contribution filings · latest on record (retrieved 3/10/2026) (fec)

PBSScore Breakdown

C
31.3
Public Benefit Score

The PBS is a weighted average of 2 components. The formula is open and versioned — the weight percentages below show how much each component contributes to the final score.

Philanthropy65% weight
14%

Evidenced charitable giving — built on what they actually give each year, not parked assets. Dominated by generosity (annual giving relative to net worth — the share of your fortune you give), plus the absolute scale of that giving, plus a small nudge for signing the Giving Pledge (a commitment, not a realized action).

Data: ProPublica 990 charitable disbursements, net worth, The Giving Pledge registry

Transparency35% weight
63%

How much sourced, public accountability data exists — net worth, political contributions, SEC filings, foundation 990s, news coverage, and a verified profile. More public disclosure scores higher.

Data: FEC, SEC EDGAR, ProPublica 990s, GDELT / NewsAPI, Wikidata

Formula (v2): PBS = 65% x Philanthropy + 35% x Transparency

Scored on 8/31/2026 on a 0–100 scale. The score uses only the signals we have populated data for. Goal Impact, Controversy, and Community Approval are deferred until that data exists — Phase 1 goal adoption, controversy detection, and community votes respectively.

All data is sourced from public records. Each section links to its original source.

Jane Goldman — Public Benefit Score C (31) | Billionaire Army